WEBINAR: Cutting Bit Rate Requirements with Perseus - an Alternative to JPEG2000 [Recorded] - VidOvation Corporation
23 Spectrum Pointe Drive, Suite 206, Lake Forest, CA 92630  [email protected] 1-949-777-5435
Select Page

Cutting Bit Rate Requirements – Recorded Webinar

We’re teaming up with V-Nova to explain how the company’s Perseus codec offers virtually lossless contribution-grade compression and bit rate savings from 25% to 75%.

During this hour-long webinar, you’ll learn:

  • How Perseus improves on today’s JPEG2000 format
  • Which use cases and workflows benefit most from Perseus versus HEVC/H.264
  • How Perseus brings added flexibility to at-home and REMI production workflows
  • The status of Perseus review by the SMPTE Standards Committee
  • Learn about the V-Nova implementation of Perseus Pro in the P.Link product
  • P.Link Codec is ideal for the Contribution of HD and UHD video over a managed IP network
    • Supports up to 8 bi-directional HD Video feeds via 3G SDI ports
    • Supports up to 2 bi-directional UHD Video feeds via 12G SDI ports

Join us for an interesting conversation on this new codec, and come with a few questions of your own!

 

Presentation

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download [3.18 MB]

Brochure

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download [390.72 KB]

Transcript

Jim Jachetta:                      Good morning folks. Jim Jachetta here. I’m the CTO of VidOvation Corporation. I think we’ll get started. We have a good number of people logged in and we’ll get started. If you have to step out or the phone rings or there’s an emergency, we will be recording today’s session, and we will be publishing the recording of this webinar. So let’s get started.

Jim Jachetta:                      What is today’s webinar about? What is PERSEUS? PERSEUS is a new codec, a new compression standard that has been introduced by our friends at V-Nova. What is the purpose of PERSEUS? One of the challenges with any transmission, whether it’s for contribution or distribution, with more and more video streams being transported, with more and more transmissions being IP, doing more at home productions, REMI Productions, et cetera, we constantly need to lower our bit rate. Bandwidth costs money.

Jim Jachetta:                      Bandwidth is not free. Now there are different levels of bandwidth. Some of our other products, we use the public internet or bonded cellular a lot. With the PERSEUS codec, it’s more for contribution or a mezzanine type compression. This is more for a managed network. This is going to be a higher bit rate, a higher quality analogous to JPEG 2000. You’ll see some comparisons between PERSEUS and JPEG 2000. The challenge is lower the bit rate. We all want to, in an ideal world, have compression where we can’t see any of the artifacts. Similar to a JPEG 2000, a PERSEUS codec has minimal losses or near visually lossless transport, which is ideal.

Jim Jachetta:                      Another advantage or another pain point is we all want our IP transport to be as close to zero latency as possible. Then we want the flexibility in our IP transport for different types of workflows, the signal flows, to support At Home productions or REMI productions where we don’t have a truck in the field anymore. We home run all the cameras back to master control and we do our workflow in a central location. PERSEUS solves some of these problems.

Jim Jachetta:                      Traditional systems now most manufacturers are focused on JPEG 2000. JPEG 2000 has been around since the year 2000. it’s in widespread deployment, but now as we migrate to 4K and UHD, JPEG 2000 really was designed more for HD or the transition from SD to HD. Now, as we all know, we’re seeing bandwidths increase four-fold. A UHD or a 4K image is equivalent to four HD signals or four times the bandwidth. We need to economize or minimize some of that extra bandwidth that’s needed, that extra bits that we have to purchase.

Jim Jachetta:                      This PERSEUS, and I should say PERSEUS Pro because there is a PERSEUS plus variant of it, but today we’re talking mostly about the PERSEUS Pro and the contribution grade codec. Similar to JPEG 2000 it’s an intraframe compression standard. In other words, it compresses inside of a given frame. There’s no compression across frames or a group of frames or a group of pictures or a GAAP.

Jim Jachetta:                      As a result you get higher picture quality. An intraframe standard is probably going to be a higher bit rate than an interframe such as H.264 HEVC. Everything in engineering there’s always going to be trade-offs. PERSEUS gives us a flexible intraframe and code decode. It gives us a higher quality along with higher efficiency. Inside by side tests, we can see savings anywhere from 25% to 80% in bit rate or data savings while still maintaining, in most cases even superior quality. Lower bit rate usually means lesser quality. It’s a more efficient codec, particularly efficient at 4K and UHD.

Jim Jachetta:                      So what is this compression standard? What is the mechanism behind it? JPEG 2000 is a wavelet-based compression system. PERSEUS uses what’s known as a hierarchical or multi-scale image representation. What does that mean? That’s a mouthful. I can barely say it. Hierarchical multi-scale. What does that mean? It means that instead of wavelet what it does is it downsamples the signal or downsamples the image. If we’re starting with a 4K or a UHD image, one of the first down samples or downscales would be to 1080p. Then a level below that might be 540. There are 15 levels of downscaling or down-conversion in PERSEUS Pro, which is great. That sounds like how compression works, where we’re minimizing in some way we’re compressing the image.

Jim Jachetta:                      But what it does very interestingly is it upconverts. Each of these 15 levels it down converts to each of these steps, then converts it back and then looks for a residual or an error. It compresses, it down converts and then it has this error information or residual information which allows it to maintain almost perfect or near or visually lossless compression.

Jim Jachetta:                      It’s a contrarian methodology to wavelet. It’s also a very quick process. These downscaling and upscaling happen in parallel, so the throughput is very quick. Hence, the latency of PERSEUS Pro is much less than some of the other standards that are out there.

Jim Jachetta:                      V-Nova has very nice… For those of you that really want to dive into the standard, PERSEUS has a very nice white paper on the subject of this hierarchical multi-scale codec, which we’ll put on our website in the notes of the webinar probably later this week or next week for those of you that want to dive deeper into that.

Jim Jachetta:                      How is PERSEUS implemented today? PERSEUS Pro is implemented in a product made by V-Nova called P.Link. P. Link, as I discussed, the P.Link uses the PERSEUS to intraframe only compression. It gives us visually lossless higher efficiencies and better video quality. By efficiencies, we mean lower bit rates and better quality. We are meaning you don’t see the artifacts or the visually lossless.

Jim Jachetta:                      I have a bad habit of spilling the beans on future slides, but on a future slide, I’ll mention also that all compression artifacts are not the same. Some of the other standards when they start getting blocky or banding PERSEUS, the artifacts are softer. You don’t see any harshness when at lower bit rates. It’s a more forgiving compression which helps to maintain this better video quality more appealing to the human eye. The other thing that’s great about these boxes here, these P.Link boxes, is if you feed them house reference or genlock, you can maintain perfect video and audio lip-sync tens of thousands of miles away. You can do a multi-camera REMI or a multi-camera At Home production, have cameras going in both directions. The box has eight I/Os. Six of the I/Os are 3G-SDI compliant, and two of the I/Os are 12G-SDI compliant.

Jim Jachetta:                      You can do two HDS or eight… I’m sorry, two UHDs and eight HDS either/or a mix and match. You could have a 4K coming in the field and four HDs coming back. You can home run eight cameras. Again, this is over a managed network. The typical bit rate on a stream is about 125 megabits per second. It does operate at lower bit rates, but this is meant for a managed network. You’re going to need a telecom connection, a fiber, et cetera, something with a service level agreement. This product or this standard is not designed, as I said earlier, to go through the public internet or to go over bonded cellular, different applications, different animal. The I/Os are bi-directional. With software we can turn an input into an output or vice versa.

Jim Jachetta:                      That gives us tremendous flexibility. If there are last-minute changes in your production workflow, “Hey we need one more camera,” or, “We need to return one more program feedback for the talent at the venue,” we can flip a channel around. You use two of these P.Link devices, one at each side. One might be out at your golf course and the other appliance would be in your master control. Of course you can gang multiples of them together. It has some unique features that help with this At Home production workflow. It’s got some dynamic multiplexing so we can assign the amount of bit rate that we want to give to each video. I’ll explain how that will benefit.

Jim Jachetta:                      You could have, if you’re home running all your cameras to master control, really the camera that’s hot, that’s being broadcasted, is the only one that needs the maximum bit rate if a camera’s on standby and a director hasn’t taken it, but I have a slide that’ll get into that. You can control adaptively the bit rate, and that dovetails into this workflow, REMI, At Home type workflow. Then it does have this full-frame mode where if you have interlaced content, it does some trickery behind the scene. I think what it does is it converts it to progressive and then down converts so you get some further economy of scale in particular if you’re doing interlaced.

Jim Jachetta:                      I see this product being used a lot in sports, and you don’t see a lot of sports being shot and interlay, so I’m not sure where this feature would come into play. You customers will tell me how that might help, that they’ll always be circumstances where maybe you’re doing 1080i and you could gain this extra 30% savings in bandwidth.

Jim Jachetta:                      So here’s this adaptive bit rate. This is a slide that kind of shows it a little better. We’re doing an At Home production, so there’s no truck or minimal truck. Maybe there’s more of a van with maybe a video engineer shading cameras. Another interesting thing about PERSEUS and P.Link the latency is extremely low. It can get down to 150 milliseconds or less. You could shade a camera with that kind of latency. Now that be the round trip latency. The camera shader could sit in master control thousands of miles away and shade the cameras remotely.

Jim Jachetta:                      In the example, I’m describing, there’s a smaller van, a smaller presence at the show, at the venue. We home run all the cameras. If you have 10 cameras or eight cameras, only one of them is going to go live at a time, so why have 80 megabits? You see in this example we have… Let me turn on my little laser pointer. We have 80 megabits per second on the program feed. The TD is selecting the camera he’s going to take next in preview, and then these proxy feeds could just be for the multi-view so that the director can see what shots he wants to take.

Jim Jachetta:                      You can see through an open API that hooks into the production switcher or through GPI contacts some sort of handshake between the production switcher and the V-Nova P.Link platform. When a camera enters preview, the bit rate can be jumped up from 10 to 60 and then when the camera is taken from the preview the program, and within a couple of frames it’s that quick, it will jump up to the higher bit rate. Certainly a director never takes a camera straight. He’s always going to preview it. Camera two ready enters preview, camera two now take, now jumps from preview the program. Then he’s looking for his next shot. Okay, camera four ready. That enters preview from the proxy. So you could see how this workflow might work.

Jim Jachetta:                      Again, this is assuming you have some constraints in bandwidth. If you have enough bandwidth, you wouldn’t need to multiplex or adaptively change the bit rate, but you can get the idea that you can do some clever techniques to minimize your bandwidth for production or for contribution or for At-Home production in particular.

Jim Jachetta:                      Other things that may be… In this scenario, we show a video stream coming back. We’re doing a golf tournament and there’s some talent in the studio and there’s some talent on-site. We might want to send the analysts, the talent at the venue, a stream. It doesn’t need to be super high quality. They just need to see the anchor or the talent in the studio. They just need to see the program feed to see their cues when they’re being questioned or the Q&A.

Jim Jachetta:                      There’s a myriad of scenarios where you can change ins and outs and adapt the system to your workflow. P. Link, again, for contribution, for a managed network, it’s a high-performance intraframe within a frame contribution codec. The benefits are it maximizes the use of your existing infrastructure so you can migrate easily from HD to UHD. Very flexible software as I’ve shown. It helps you to support different workflows. It has an intuitive based GUI and it integrates with your network management system. It seamlessly can drop into your existing infrastructure all with a nice open API. Of course, any of you that are interested, we can set up a demo with our partner V-Nova, set up a demo through VidOvation to get you folks to play with some of this stuff.

Jim Jachetta:                      Then another nice thing too is it doesn’t run on a proprietary piece of hardware. It runs on a carrier-grade commercial off the shelf server. It’s got hot-swappable power supplies, cooling, very low mean time between failures. It’s a very reliable carrier-grade appliance, which is perfect for our mission-critical content or contribution coming in from the field.

Jim Jachetta:                      Here’s a little snapshot of some comparisons. Lowest bandwidth, its flexibility, and bi-directionality, compared to JPEG 2000 with its more rigidity. I don’t think JPEG 2000 is going away anytime soon. There’s a big footprint out there, but if you’re looking to modernize or particularly switching from more of an on-site production to an At-Home production, a REMI production, the PERSEUS Pro implemented with P.Link starts to make much sense.

Jim Jachetta:                      Another thing to is at VidOvation we represent solutions for H.264, HEVC. These solutions are primarily for unmanaged networks but they could go over-managed. Picture quality is good, but a mezzanine codec like PERSEUS Pro, a higher bit rate, lower latency is going to give you higher quality. If you’re the primary rights holder on a function, you want the best possible quality coming into the field. Because unlike a temporal codec like MPEG or like H.264 or HEVC because we’re only compressing in one frame, not across frames, we don’t have a group of frames or a group of pictures like these other standards, temporal or motion distortions or anomalies are minimized.

Jim Jachetta:                      I’m sure many of you know the difference between intraframe and interframe. If you have motion, here a little diagram. It looks like somebody has got a ping pong mallet with a ping pong ball. And you see the only thing really moving in the frame is the ping pong ball. Now, if we’re using PERSEUS or an interframe codec, you could argue, look, none of these pixels in the frame of change, so why do we send the same frame essentially the second time, the third time?

Jim Jachetta:                      Well, you might in a MPEG format or a temporal codec, you might start seeing some motion artifacts around the moving objects, some scalloping of the leading edge of the moving object, whereas you won’t see that in an interframe MPEG standard.

Jim Jachetta:                      So you see here in an interframe, you only send the information that’s changed. So you don’t send all these bits. So that’s why H.264 and HEVC can do much, much lower bit rates. But again, in engineering, it’s that trade-off. How important is this content? Are you going to be archiving this content and using it over and over again for highlights, et cetera? It’s different applications. Not every production can afford the unmanaged network to use transport like Perseus or P.Link. Again, VidOvation helps our customers navigate some of these decisions of what type of technology to use.

Jim Jachetta:                      In a nutshell, the PERSEUS, the interframe, it’s going to give you much more consistent quality. We all know that shot over a sea of faces in basketball or the tiny white ball over blades of grass in golf, the quick pans, the quick zooms, those can challenge H.264 and HEVC codecs where a PERSEUS interframe can handle that type of more challenging content, high motion content, and offer lower latency than HEVC and H.264 because we have these group of frames that we’re compressing across or group of pictures or GOP as we call it. The latency has got to be at least as long as the GOP. That’s the theoretical limit. By being interframe, we can get very aggressive on the latency and minimize any temporal distortions.

Jim Jachetta:                      A common question we get is, okay, this is some new standard. What happens if we adopt it, and it goes away? One of the common questions we get is it an SMPTE standard? It’s in committee right now. The project is named VC-6. The pending designation for the standard is ST 2117 or 2117. In the future it’s anticipated that you’ll be able to buy off-the-shelf decoders that conform to the PERSEUS compression standard once it becomes standardized and ratified by SMPTE.

Jim Jachetta:                      Again, some of this I’m kind of being a little bit redundant. I did talk about it’s meant for managed networks for higher bit rates. It is able to go at lower bit rates. It does have that ability. When you compare PERSEUS at lower bit rates to JPEG 2000 at lower bit rates, in side-by-side visual tests, the PERSEUS looks much better. When compression artifacts do start to appear, they tend to be less harsh. No sharp edges. It’s very hard for the untrained eye to see the compression and, again, the flexibility of the platform to do different types of productions.

Jim Jachetta:                      One take away is the PERSEUS is so efficient, it can handle a 4K signal with the same bit rate as an HD signal with JPEG 2000, so it does have that four to one or 75% or 80% more efficiency compared to JPEG 2000 which I think we all need with 4K on the horizon or just to save bandwidth costs because you’re going to need that on managed network. Now, if we can buy that pipe with a nice SLA service level agreement, get a nice solid connection, maybe have two connections for redundancy, if we can cut the bit rate needed by 75% that pipe becomes a lot less expensive. That’s important to all of us.

Jim Jachetta:                      In conclusion, saving the costs, lowering that bit rate compared to JPEG 2000, we all want our compression to be visually lossless, near-lossless and you get that with PERSEUS Pro, getting higher efficiency, higher video quality, and then maintaining extremely low latency and then having that flexible signal flow, eight ins, eight outs or any combination therein. You have those eight unidirectional I/O ports and then the ability to maintain genlock and perfect lip sync across all of these cameras.

Jim Jachetta:                      We bring these cameras home to a centralized location. If they’re all out of sync, then we’re going to need eight frame syncs and standards converters, et cetera. We want everything to come through. If it’s a live show, in particular, we can’t fix video synchronization and lip-sync problems in post-production. This is a live show. The PERSEUS and the P.Link maintain all of that.

Jim Jachetta:                      Today I concentrated mostly on what’s known as PERSEUS Pro. That’s the contribution grade codec we see being used for production, a mezzanine type compression standard. I could even see this maybe being even used for archival purposes, having a higher bit rate, a higher quality near losses for archival purposes. So you get unmatched compression and processing speed and no exotic hardware, commercial carrier-grade commercial off the shelf hardware.

Jim Jachetta:                      Then I think what we’ll do is we’ll do a second webinar to talk about PERSEUS Plus. Where PERSEUS Pro is for contribution, PERSEUS Plus is more for distribution or over the top. In the way that PERSEUS Pro does its down-converting and upconverting, PERSEUS Plus sits on top of industry-standard codecs, so an H.264, an HEVC, VP-9, AV-1. It sits as a secondary channel, and it looks for the error. It compares the H.264 compression to the original content and in a loop comes up with that different signal, that error signal. It analyzes and it adds extra clarity, extra resolution to industry-standard codecs out there. And there’s no need to change your existing architecture.

Jim Jachetta:                      If you have an IRDs or decoders, you don’t have to throw them all out. If you are streaming the mobile devices, PERSEUS Plus could sit in the background as kind of a supercharge for the existing infrastructure, the existing stream. We’ll talk more about that in an upcoming webinar, but that’s more for distribution and over the top.

Jim Jachetta:                      I’m sure most of you, you know who VidOvation is, but I’ll give you a quick overview. At VidOvation, we work with a number of different partners similar to V-Nova. We worked with Aviwest for bonded cellular, ABonAir for wireless, MultiDyne for fiberoptics and a myriad of other partners. VidOvation, we’re a video transmission and distribution company. Our tagline is “Moving Video Forward.” We help our clients move video from point A to point B for live contribution and distribution. We work with broadcasters, news networks, sports leagues, corporations, enterprise, et cetera. We provide consulting, design engineering, system integration, project management, warranty, and support. And you can see some of the names of the companies we’ve been working with lately, such as CNN, Turner, Fox, the NFL, Viacom, A&E, et cetera. Do you folks have any questions for us?

Jim Jachetta:                      Let me see if any hands have been raised. Maybe not. Let me see. It doesn’t look like there are any questions. Folks, we thank you for tuning in today. You can see my contact information. You can reach VidOvation at (949) 777-5435. that’s our phone number. You can reach our sales department at [email protected] You can reach me at  [email protected] We’d love to work with you or answer any further questions you might have.

Jim Jachetta:                      Thank you so much. Look for a recording of this webinar online sometime soon. Thank you so much and have a great day.